Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02295
Original file (BC 2014 02295.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02295

						COUNSEL:  NONE

						HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following medals/ribbon:

      1.  Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM). 

	2.  Vietnam Service Medal (VSM).

      3.  Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR)        
      (Administratively resolved).


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He had several temporary duty (TDY) assignments to Osan Air Base (AB), Kunsan, AB, and Kimpo AB, Korea between 1969 and 1971, and he went TDY to Cam Rhan Bay AB, Republic of Vietnam, in 1971.  Additionally, on 15 Feb 72, he had a small arms shooting score of 60, qualifying him for the SAEMR.   

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 19 Dec 68. 

On 18 Dec 72, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge, and was credited with four years of active service, to include 1 year, 10 months, and 18 days of foreign service.   

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice regarding award of the KDSM and VSM.  The KDSM is awarded to service members who were assigned, attached, or mobilized to units operating or serving on all the land area of the Republic of Korea, and the contiguous waters out to 12 nautical miles, and all airspace above the stated land and water areas.  To be eligible for the KDSM, personnel must have been physically present in the stated areas for 30 consecutive days or 60 nonconsecutive days.  After a thorough review of the applicant’s official military personnel record, there was no evidence indicating the applicant served in the area of responsibility for 30 consecutive days or 60 non-consecutive days, required for award of the KDSM.  

The Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the United States Armed Forces who served in Vietnam or contiguous waters or airspace after 3 Jul 65, and before 28 Mar 73.  In addition, personnel serving in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia in direct support of operations in Vietnam during the same time period also were eligible for the VSM.  To be eligible, a service member must be: permanently assigned, attached, or detailed for one, or more, days with an organization participating in or directly supporting ground (military) operations; permanently assigned, attached, or detailed for one, or more days aboard a naval vessel directly supporting military operations; have actually participated as a crew member in one or more aerial flights directly supporting military operations; have served on temporary duty for 30 consecutive or 60 non-consecutive days.  Those time limitations may be waived for personnel participating in actual combat operations.  However, there was no official documentation in the applicant’s records or his submission verifying that he met any of the criteria listed above. 

Notwithstanding the above, the applicant’s entitlement to the following awards and decoration was verified and his records will be corrected upon final decision by the Board:

	1.  Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with one Bronze Oak Leaf Cluster (AFOUA w/1BOLC).

	2.  Air Force Longevity Service Award (AFLSA).

	3.  Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR).

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.



AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice regarding the applicant’s record not reflecting his service in Vietnam and Korea.  They were able to verify and confirm foreign service boots on ground in Japan, but unable to confirm any foreign service in Vietnam or Korea.  
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit D.  


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 7 Jan 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E).  As of this date, no response has been received by this office.


FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD:

After careful consideration of applicant’s request and the available evidence of record, we find the application untimely.  Applicant did not file within three years after the alleged error or injustice was discovered as required by Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552 and Air Force Instruction    36-2603.  Applicant has not shown a plausible reason for the delay in filing, and we are not persuaded that the record raises issues of error or injustice which require resolution on the merits.  Thus, while we note AFPC/DPSID has seen fit to make a variety of administrative corrections to the applicant’s records, we cannot conclude it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to file in a timely manner..


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The application was not timely filed and it would not be in the interest of justice to waive the untimeliness.  It is the decision of the Board, therefore, to reject the application as untimely.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02295 in Executive Session on 21 Apr 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:



The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02295 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 31 May 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSID, dated 3 Nov 14, w/atch.
	Exhibit D.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 30 Jul 14.
      Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Jan 15.

						





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03890

    Original file (BC-2012-03890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03890 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Guam with the 3960th Strategic Wing for 176...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03773

    Original file (BC-2012-03773.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) c. Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM) d. National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) e. Air Force Longevity Service Award (AFLSA) Upon final board decision, administrative correction of the applicant's official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOY. The complete DPSID evaluation is at exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In response the applicant...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04710

    Original file (BC-2012-04710.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04710 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be updated to reflect award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR) and any other awards he may be eligible to receive. The remaining...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02083

    Original file (BC 2013 02083.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects award of the VSM, however, DPSID is unable to substantiate the applicant was in the area of eligibility for this award. Furthermore, if the Board accepts the order as proof of Vietnam service, it only indicates 10 days, which does not meet the 30 day criteria for award of the VSM or the 6 month criteria for award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal. The following documentary evidence in AFBCMR Docket Number BC- 2013-02083 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02870

    Original file (BC-2012-02870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the DVA denied his claim because he could not provide a copy of his TDY orders or any official verification that he ever deployed to Thailand during the Vietnam War. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 29 Oct 12, by letter, the applicant reiterates his original contentions. _________________________________________________________________ The following...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02237

    Original file (BC 2013 02237.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In this respect, the applicant provides a detailed account of his temporary duty at Tan Son Nhut AB, Vietnam, in 1972 with supporting documentation showing he was issued an M-16. With respect to a comment in the DPAPP advisory opinion that the information provided by the applicant “did not contain information that reflects [the applicant] served in Vietnam,” that documentation does contain evidence that the applicant served in Vietnam: his detailed statement attached to his application. We...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05113

    Original file (BC-2011-05113.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Only members who meet the criteria for the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (Vietnam) or VSM during the period of service are considered to have contributed direct combat support to the RVN armed forces. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00405

    Original file (BC 2014 00405.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00405 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect service in South Korea and award of the Korean Service Medal (KSM) as well as any other awards and decorations that were inadvertently omitted. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01393

    Original file (BC 2014 01393.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no official documentation in the applicant’s records to verify he was in the area of eligibility for an aggregate of 6 months for award of the VCM. In additional, the Air Force Personnel Center, Directorate of Assignments verified the applicant as having served at Kadena Air Base, Okinawa, but they were unable to confirm any foreign-service in Vietnam; therefore, rendering him ineligible for award of the VCM. To be eligible, a service member must be: permanently assigned,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02597

    Original file (BC 2013 02597.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 Aug 13, AFPC/DPSID notified the applicant they were able to verify the applicant’s entitlement to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) and will correct his records administratively. After a thorough review of the applicant’s official military personnel record, there is no documentation in the applicant’s military personnel records verifying he was in the area of eligibility for the VSM or that he qualified as expert with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun. ...